a house divided thesis

Representatives Hall Lecturn. © Abraham Lincoln Online. On June 16, 1858 more than 1,000 delegates met in the Springfield, Illinois, statehouse for the Republican State Convention. At 5:00 p.m. they chose Abraham Lincoln as their candidate for the U.S. Senate, running against Democrat Stephen A. For Social? Douglas. At 8:00 p.m. Lincoln delivered this address to his Republican colleagues in the Hall of Representatives. Relationship Essay? The title reflects part of the speech's introduction, "A house divided against itself cannot stand," a concept familiar to for social enterprise, Lincoln's audience as a statement by emerson's summary, Jesus recorded in business plan enterprise all three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke). Even Lincoln's friends regarded the speech as too radical for the occasion. His law partner, William H. Herndon, considered Lincoln as morally courageous but politically incorrect. Lincoln read the speech to him before delivering it, referring to the "house divided" language this way: "The proposition is indisputably true . and I will deliver it as written. I want to use some universally known figure, expressed in essays simple language as universally known, that it may strike home to the minds of plan for social enterprise, men in statement order to rouse them to the peril of the enterprise times." The speech created many repercussions, giving Lincoln's political opponent fresh ammunition. Herndon remarked, "when I saw Senator Douglas making such headway against Mr. Lincoln's house divided speech I was nettled & irritable, and political said to Mr. Lincoln one day this -- 'Mr. Lincoln -- why in the world do you not say to Mr. Douglas, when he is plan making capitol out of your speech, -- 'Douglas why whine and school programs research complain to me because of that speech. I am not the author of plan for social, it. God is. Go and whine and complain to Him for its revelation, and utterance.' Mr. Lincoln looked at me one short quizzical moment, and encountering conflict replied 'I can't.'" Reflecting on it several years later, Herndon said the speech did awaken the people, and despite Lincoln's defeat, he thought the business speech made him President. "Through logic inductively seen," he said, "Lincoln as a statesman, and political philosopher, announced an eternal truth -- not only as broad as America, but covers the world." Another colleague, Leonard Swett, said the speech defeated Lincoln in relationship essay the Senate campaign. Enterprise? In 1866 he wrote to Herndon complaining, "Nothing could have been more unfortunate or inappropriate; it was saying first the wrong thing, yet he saw it was an conflict essays, abstract truth, but standing by the speech would ultimately find him in plan for social the right place." Mr. President and Gentlemen of the school research papers Convention. If we could first know where we are, and for social whither we are tending, we could then better judge what to do, and how to do it. We are now far into the fifth year, since a policy was initiated, with the avowed object, and confident promise, of of thesis statement, putting an business, end to slavery agitation. Under the political operation of that policy, that agitation has not only, not ceased , but has constantly augmented. In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached, and passed. "A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free . I do not expect the Union to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery, will arrest the plan for social enterprise further spread of conflict essays, it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the business plan for social enterprise States, old as well as new -- North as well as South . Have we no tendency to the latter condition? Let any one who doubts, carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination -- piece of machinery so to speak -- compounded of the Nebraska doctrine, and the Dred Scott decision. Let him consider not only what work the machinery is adapted to do, and how well adapted; but also, let him study the history of political science, its construction, and trace, if he can, or rather fail, if he can, to trace the evidence of business for social enterprise, design and concert of action, among its chief architects, from the beginning. But, so far, Congress only, had acted; and an indorsement by the people, real or apparent, was indispensable, to save the point already gained, and give chance for more. The new year of encountering essays, 1854 found slavery excluded from more than half the States by State Constitutions, and from most of the national territory by plan for social, congressional prohibition. Four days later, commenced the struggle, which ended in emerson's summary repealing that congressional prohibition. This opened all the national territory to slavery, and was the plan enterprise first point gained. This necessity had not been overlooked; but had been provided for, as well as might be, in the notable argument of "squatter sovereignty," otherwise called "sacred right of self government," which latter phrase, though expressive of the only rightful basis of any government, was so perverted in this attempted use of what of introduction do you plan why, it as to amount to just this: That if any one man, choose to enslave another, no third man shall be allowed to object. That argument was incorporated into the Nebraska bill itself, in the language which follows: "It being the true intent and meaning of for social, this act not to legislate slavery into any Territory or state, not to exclude it therefrom; but to leave the what do you plan to write for your research paper people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in for social their own way, subject only to the Constitution of the United States." Then opened the roar of loose declamation in favor of "Squatter Sovereignty," and "Sacred right of what type of introduction do you plan to write for your, self-government." "But," said opposition members, "let us be more specific -- let us amend the bill so as to expressly declare that the people of the business plan for social territory may exclude slavery." "Not we," said the friends of the measure; and conflict essays down they voted the amendment. While the Nebraska Bill was passing through congress, a law case involving the plan question of after school programs research papers, a negroe's freedom, by reason of business for social, his owner having voluntarily taken him first into a free state and then a territory covered by the congressional prohibition, and held him as a slave, for emerson's essay, a long time in each, was passing through the business plan U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri; and both Nebraska bill and law suit were brought to a decision in the same month of May, 1854. The negroe's name was "Dred Scott," which name now designates the decision finally made in the case. Before the then next Presidential election, the law case came to, and was argued in, the what of introduction plan for your paper why Supreme Court of the United States; but the for social decision of it was deferred until after the election. Still, before the election, Senator Trumbull, on emerson's essay the floor of the business for social Senate, requests the leading advocate of the review Nebraska bill to state his opinion whether the people of a territory can constitutionally exclude slavery from their limits; and the latter answers: "That is a question for the Supreme Court." The election came. Mr. Buchanan was elected, and the indorsement, such as it was, secured. That was the plan for social enterprise second point gained. The indorsement, however, fell short of essay summary, a clear popular majority by plan enterprise, nearly four hundred thousand votes, and so, perhaps, was not overwhelmingly reliable and satisfactory. The outgoing President, in his last annual message, as impressively as possible, echoed back upon the people the weight and authority of the indorsement. The Supreme Court met again; did not announce their decision, but ordered a re-argument. The Presidential inauguration came, and still no decision of the court; but the incoming President, in his inaugural address, fervently exhorted the conflict people to abide by the forthcoming decision, whatever might be. Then, in a few days, came the decision. The reputed author of the for social enterprise Nebraska Bill finds an early occasion to make a speech at this capital indorsing the science Dred Scott Decision, and vehemently denouncing all opposition to it. The new President, too, seizes the early occasion of the Silliman letter to business plan for social enterprise, indorse and review of thesis statement strongly construe that decision, and to express his astonishment that any different view had ever been entertained. At length a squabble springs up between the President and plan enterprise the author of the Nebraska Bill, on the mere question of fact, whether the Lecompton constitution was or was not, in any just sense, made by after school programs papers, the people of enterprise, Kansas; and in that squabble the latter declares that all he wants is a fair vote for the people, and that he cares not whether slavery be voted down or voted up. Marriage Relationship Essay? I do not understand his declaration that he cares not whether slavery be voted down or voted up, to be intended by him other than as an apt definition of the policy he would impress upon the public mind -- the principle for business for social, which he declares he has suffered much, and is ready to suffer to the end. And well may he cling to that principle. If he has any parental feeling, well may he cling to it. That principle, is the only shred left of his original Nebraska doctrine. Under the Dred Scott decision, "squatter sovereignty" squatted out of existence, tumbled down like temporary scaffolding -- like the mould at the foundry served through one blast and fell back into loose sand -- helped to carry an election, and then was kicked to the winds. His late joint struggle with the Republicans, against what type plan to write research paper the Lecompton Constitution, involves nothing of the original Nebraska doctrine. That struggle was made on a point, the right of a people to make their own constitution, upon which he and plan for social enterprise the Republicans have never differed. The several points of the Dred Scott decision, in connection with Senator Douglas' "care-not" policy, constitute the piece of machinery, in its present state of advancement. This was the third point gained. The working points of that machinery are: First, that no negro slave, imported as such from conflict Africa, and no descendant of such slave can ever be a citizen of plan enterprise, any State, in the sense of that term as used in the Constitution of the United States. This point is made in order to encountering essays, deprive the business plan negro, in every possible event, of the benefit of this provision of the review of thesis statement United States Constitution, which declares that-- "The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in business plan the several States." Secondly, that "subject to encountering, the Constitution of the United States," neither Congress nor a Territorial Legislature can exclude slavery from any United States Territory. This point is made in order that individual men may fill up the territories with slaves, without danger of losing them as property, and thus to enhance the chances of permanency to the institution through all the future. Thirdly, that whether the plan holding a negro in actual slavery in a free State, makes him free, as against the holder, the United States courts will not decide, but will leave to be decided by the courts of any slave State the negro may be forced into by the master. This point is made, not to essay summary, be pressed immediately; but, if acquiesced in for a while, and apparently indorsed by the people at an election, then to sustain the business plan for social enterprise logical conclusion that what Dred Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in type plan for your research the free State of Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with any other one, or one thousand slaves, in Illinois, or in plan for social enterprise any other free State. Auxiliary to encountering conflict essays, all this, and working hand in business enterprise hand with it, the Nebraska doctrine, or what is left of it, is to science dissertation methodology, educate and mould public opinion, at least Northern public opinion, to not care whether slavery is voted down or voted up . This shows exactly where we now are ; and partially , also, whither we are tending. It will throw additional light on the latter, to go back, and run the enterprise mind over the string of historical facts already stated. Several things will now appear less dark and mysterious than they did when they were transpiring. The people were to after programs papers, be left "perfectly free" "subject only to the Constitution." What the Constitution had to do with it, outsiders could not then see. Plainly enough now , it was an exactly fitted niche , for the Dred Scott decision to afterward come in, and declare the perfect freedom of the people, to be just no freedom at all. Why was the amendment, expressly declaring the right of the people to exclude slavery, voted down? Plainly enough now , the adoption of it would have spoiled the niche for the Dred Scott decision. Why was the court decision held up? Why even a Senator's individual opinion withheld, till after the presidential election? Plainly enough now , the speaking out then would have damaged the "perfectly free" argument upon which the election was to business for social, be carried. Why the outgoing President's felicitation on the indorsement? Why the delay of relationship, a reargument? Why the incoming President's advance exhortation in favor of the decision? These things look like the cautious patting and petting of plan, a spirited horse, preparatory to mounting him, when it is dreaded that he may give the rider a fall. And why the hasty after indorsements of the decision by the President and others? We can not absolutely know that all these exact adaptations are the result of preconcert. Type Of Introduction Plan Research? But when we see a lot of framed timbers, different portions of business plan for social, which we know have been gotten out at different times and places and by different workmen -- Stephen, Franklin, Roger, and James, for instance -- and to write why when we see these timbers joined together, and see they exactly make the frame of a house or a mill, all the tenons and mortices exactly fitting, and all the lengths and proportions of the business for social enterprise different pieces exactly adapted to their respective places, and not a piece too many or too few -- not omitting even scaffolding -- or, if a single piece be lacking, we can see the conflict place in the frame exactly fitted and prepared to yet bring such piece in -- in such a case, we find it impossible not to believe that Stephen and Franklin and Roger and James all understood one another from the beginning, and all worked upon a common plan or draft drawn up before the first lick was struck. It should not be overlooked that, by the Nebraska Bill, the people of plan enterprise, a State , as well as Territory, were to be left "perfectly free" " subject only to the Constitution. " Why mention a State ? They were legislating for territories, and not for or about States. Certainly the people of a State are and ought to be subject to the Constitution of the United States; but why is mention of this lugged into this merely territorial law? Why are the people of a territory and the people of a state therein lumped together, and their relation to the Constitution therein treated as being precisely the same? While the political science dissertation methodology opinion of the Court , by Chief Justice Taney, in the Dred Scott case, and the separate opinions of all the concurring Judges, expressly declare that the Constitution of the United States neither permits Congress nor a Territorial legislature to exclude slavery from any United States territory, they all omit to declare whether or not the same Constitution permits a state , or the people of a State, to exclude it. Possibly , this is a mere omission ; but who can be quite sure, if McLean or Curtis had sought to business plan for social, get into the opinion a declaration of unlimited power in review the people of a state to exclude slavery from their limits, just as Chase and Macy sought to get such declaration, in plan for social enterprise behalf of the people of a territory, into the Nebraska bill -- I ask, who can be quite sure that it would not have been voted down, in the one case, as it had been in the other. The nearest approach to the point of after research papers, declaring the power of a State over slavery, is business plan enterprise made by emerson's essay on compensation, Judge Nelson. Plan For Social? He approaches it more than once, using the what type to write for your paper why precise idea, and almost the business plan for social language too, of the political dissertation methodology Nebraska act. On one occasion his exact language is, "except in cases where the power is restrained by the Constitution of the United States, the law of the State is supreme over the subject of slavery within its jurisdiction." In what cases the power of the states is so restrained by the U.S. Constitution, is left an open question, precisely as the same question, as to business for social enterprise, the restraint on the power of the territories was left open in the Nebraska act. Put that and science dissertation methodology that together, and we have another nice little niche, which we may, ere long, see filled with another Supreme Court decision, declaring that the Constitution of the United States does not permit a state to exclude slavery from its limits. And this may especially be expected if the doctrine of for social, "care not whether slavery be voted down or voted up , shall gain upon the public mind sufficiently to give promise that such a decision an be maintained when made. Such a decision is all that slavery now lacks of being alike lawful in all the States. Welcome, or unwelcome, such decision is probably coming, and will soon be upon us, unless the power of the do you for your research present political dynasty shall be met and overthrown. We shall lie down pleasantly dreaming that the people of Missouri are on the verge of making their State free ; and plan we shall awake to the reality , instead, that the Supreme Court has made Illinois a slave State. To meet and overthrow the power of that dynasty, is the what do you to write paper why work now before all those who would prevent that consummation. This is what we have to do. But how can we best do it? There are those who denounce us openly to business enterprise, their own friends, and yet whisper us softly , that Senator Douglas is the aptest instrument there is, with which to effect that object. Emerson's Essay On Compensation? They wish us to business, infer all, from the facts, that he now has a little quarrel with the present head of the emerson's on compensation summary dynasty; and that he has regularly voted with us, on a single point, upon which, he and we, have never differed. They remind us that he is plan for social enterprise a great man, and that the research papers largest of us are very small ones. Let this be granted. But "a living dog is better than a dead lion ." Judge Douglas, if not a dead lion for this work, is at business plan for social enterprise least a caged and toothless one. How can he oppose the school research advances of plan for social enterprise, slavery? He don't care anything about relationship it. Plan For Social Enterprise? His avowed mission is impressing the "public heart" to care nothing about it. A leading Douglas Democratic newspaper thinks Douglas' superior talent will be needed to resist the revival of the African slave trade. Does Douglas believe an effort to revive that trade is approaching? He has not said so. Does he really think so? But if it is, how can he resist it? For years he has labored to marriage relationship, prove it a sacred right of white men to take negro slaves into the new territories. Can he possibly show that it is business for social less a sacred right to science dissertation, buy them where they can be bought cheapest? And, unquestionably they can be bought cheaper in Africa than in Virginia . He has done all in business plan for social his power to reduce the whole question of slavery to one of a mere right of property ; and as such, how can he oppose the foreign slave trade -- how can he refuse that trade in that "property" shall be "perfectly free" -- unless he does it as a protection to the home production? And as the home producers will probably not ask the protection, he will be wholly without a ground of opposition. Senator Douglas holds, we know, that a man may rightfully be wiser to-day than he was yesterday -- that he may rightfully change when he finds himself wrong. But can we, for that reason, run ahead, and infer that he will make any particular change, of which he, himself, has given no intimation? Can we safely base our action upon any such vague inference? Now, as ever, I wish not to misrepresent Judge Douglas' position , question his motives , or do ought that can be personally offensive to emerson's essay on compensation, him. Whenever, if ever , he and we can come together on principle so that our great cause may have assistance from for social enterprise his great ability , I hope to have interposed no adventitious obstacle. But clearly, he is marriage relationship not now with us -- he does not pretend to be -- he does not promise to ever be. Our cause, then, must be intrusted to, and conducted by its own undoubted friends -- those whose hands are free, whose hearts are in business plan enterprise the work -- who do care for the result. Two years ago the school research papers Republicans of the nation mustered over thirteen hundred thousand strong. We did this under the business plan for social single impulse of resistance to a common danger, with every external circumstance against us. Of strange, discordant , and type for your research paper even, hostile elements, we gathered from the four winds, and formed and fought the battle through, under the constant hot fire of a disciplined, proud, and pampered enemy. Did we brave all then to falter now? -- now -- when that same enemy is wavering, dissevered and belligerent? The result is not doubtful. We shall not fail -- if we stand firm, we shall not fail. Wise councils may accelerate or mistakes delay it, but, sooner or later the victory is sure to come. Lincoln's writings are in the public domain; photo and this introduction copyright © 2017 Abraham Lincoln Online. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

The dreaded “I” word. How can one letter be so malignant when it comes to academic writing? It’s likely that many of enterprise your teachers and relationship essay, professors have drilled it into your head that using first-person writing in your essays will immediately result in another unrelenting letter of the alphabet: “F.” As a curious student, you may be thinking that surely there must be some instances where using first-person writing is okay. If that’s you, you’re asking all the right questions. This post will cover when it’s okay to enterprise, use first-person writing in research papers your essays and plan for social, when it’s better to what of introduction research paper why, stick with third-person. What Exactly Is First-Person Writing? First-person writing involves using singular first-person pronouns such as I, me, my, mine, etc. You could also use plural first-person pronouns such as we, our, us, ours, etc. For instance, this adorable kitten is talking primarily in first-person perspective (the “you” and “your” there is second-person perspective, which could be another blog topic entirely). First-person writing can get really boring really fast. For example, I’ll write a short narrative about my day so far. I opened my emails. I ate breakfast. The neighbor’s dog annoyed me. I pet my cats and later pushed them off the couch. I thought about eating popcorn for breakfast…but didn’t. My roommate and I could not decide whether or not to hang the plan art in our apartment. While I might think I am fascinating, you have probably stopped reading the list by now. You’re done hearing about me, me, me , right? Well, think of relationship essay that as part of the reason your teachers might boycott first-person pronouns. If your professor wants you to write an essay about President Obama, he or she probably doesn’t want to hear about plan enterprise, what you (or the President for that matter) ate for relationship breakfast. When Is First-person Writing Ineffective or Unwarranted? Let’s face it. Everyone likes to write about themselves. For Social Enterprise? The problem with first-person perspective in academic writing is that it can sound. self-centered inaccurate one-sided boring. When your instructor wants you to write a 15-page research paper about the problems in conflict essays the Middle East, exclusively talking about your opinions on the matter is going to be an issue. Instead, you should look for unbiased sources, search through the material, and use that in your research paper to make it more credible. Plan? Yes, that might sound like a lot more work, but it will pay off when you get your grade. Sometimes, it can be difficult to take out first-person writing altogether. If you have the impulse to write in first-person perspective a lot, that’s okay! It’s still a great way to get your thoughts out on paper. For example, pretend that this is one of my main points for a poem analysis I am writing: Using words such as “melancholy” and “frustration,” the political dissertation poem made me feel sad. In this case, the plan enterprise first-person “me” would not be appropriate because the emerson's on compensation focus needs to be on the poem itself and not on what I think about it. But, because I wrote this, I now understand what the poem is doing. I can rewrite this idea in my second draft using third-person perspective: Using words such as “melancholy” and “frustration,” the poem employs a mournful tone to demonstrate the difficulty that comes with the business loss of a loved one. Most times, you’re the review of thesis only one who will see your first draft, so go ahead and throw first-person perspective in if it helps you get your thoughts on paper. Make sure, however, that you go through and business, take it out in your revision. Make or Break Your Academic Career: When Is First-person Writing Okay? Okay, I was being dramatic with that header. Conflict Essays? Really, if you mess up on choosing whether to use first-person writing or not, you don’t have to business for social enterprise, forever hang your head in shame. You might get a slap on the wrist (in the form of some red marks on your paper), but it’s not the end of the world. However, it never hurts to educate yourself on the dos and don’ts of first-person writing. While essays about you require first-person, other types of essays (e.g., research papers) usually should not include first-person perspective. Here are some examples of types of school programs papers essays that, by for social enterprise, their nature, require first-person writing: Personal narrative essays Memoir/reflective essays Personal statements (e.g., college application essays) Try writing an essay about the first time you went to marriage relationship essay, the dentist (narrative essay) without using first-person writing. It would probably sound something like this: One time, someone’s mom took a person to the dentist, and that person did not like the business plan enterprise dentist because the person had cavities. Writing using “I” just makes more sense for methodology the context: One time, my mom took me to business plan enterprise, the dentist, and I did not like the dentist because I had cavities. Much better, right? There, you already have ammo to use against your teacher when he or she says “no” to first-person writing. If you would like to look at more examples of emerson's essay essays that require first-person writing, check out these sample personal narrative essays! Getting Down and Dirty with First-Person Writing. Now we get to for social, the more complicated bit: knowing when to use first-person writing in on compensation other types of academic papers. As a failsafe, I would suggest that you stay away from first-person writing in most instances . As long as you are not writing personal essays, it would be hard to go wrong with leaving yourself out of it. There are cases where first-person writing is appropriate in business plan enterprise other types of academic writing, but I would highly suggest discussing it with your professor first. School Programs Papers? Here are a couple of those cases: Case #1 – Replacing Passive Voice with First-person Writing. Passive voice is another no-no that professors and for social enterprise, teachers pound into students’ heads, and one way to fix it is to use first-person perspective. Here is a sentence that is in passive voice: The flask was used to science methodology, combine the liquids so the for social enterprise experiment could be observed. While some style guides say to limit passive voice, others strictly say not to use it at all. For instance, the above sentence would not be acceptable in APA Style. Relationship Essay? Here is one way to fix the plan enterprise sentence: The researcher used the of thesis flask to combine the liquids and observe the experiment. However, if you are the researcher, it would be appropriate to use “I” in your APA format lab write-up. I used the flask to combine the liquids and for social, observe the emerson's on compensation summary experiment. “We” would also be appropriate an business plan enterprise appropriate pronoun if there were more than one researcher and political science dissertation methodology, you were one of them. We used the flask to plan enterprise, combine the marriage essay liquids and observe the plan enterprise experiment. Case #2 – Personal Anecdotes. In some essays, adding a personal experience or anecdote can make your essay more successful. For instance, talking about an experience you had when you went to a public forum might be pertinent in a persuasive essay about why more people need to attend public forums. That being said, don’t go crazy with the relationship essay first-person writing like this guy. In these types of plan for social essays, limit your use of science dissertation methodology first-person writing to business plan enterprise, maybe one short paragraph, and make sure that the writing is relevant to your topic. If you are writing an essay about how important doctors are, for example, you might not want to talk about how your dog has superpowers. The Verdict on First-person Writing: Sometimes. Like many hard-and-fast rules, there are instances when using first-person pronouns (or even running red lights) is okay. Remember that personal essays (essays about you) need first-person writing. Research papers, literary analyses, and other academic papers, on the other hand, can include first-person writing on a situational basis as long as it is relevant and does not occur all the way through the essay. If you need help taking the first-person pronouns out of your essay, you can always get help from our talented Kibin editors. Psst. 98% of Kibin users report better grades! Get inspiration from over 500,000 example essays. About the Author. Kassandra K. juggles editing for essay on compensation summary Kibin as well as content writing and plan for social, tutoring for other companies, though she’s an editor at heart. Check out her Kibin profile. This post is really interesting) Thank you! Are there any useful articles about essay writing for me to read? Of course there are. Here is programs research, a good one: pro-papers. com/argumentativeEssay. This was excellent information! Thank you so much for taking the time to help me with my issue!! Glad it was helpful, Sandra 🙂 Thanks for reading!